data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13e9a/13e9a92fdec63a19032f1e57cfe311ab2e102310" alt=""
The
SciNews website has produced a remarkable video explaining the technique, which
you can see by clicking here. The
Wall Street Journal also produced a video presentation on the topic, one just a
bit more technical and seriously more sophisticated. (To see it, click here. Both videos are well worth watching
and supplement each other nicely since each is only about three minutes long.)
As I understand it, the basic concept is that the scroll is sliced open
sideways digitally by utilizing a process that makes it possible to read the
ink on each unimaginably narrow sliver in light of the ink on the ones adjacent
to it, something like taking a rolled-up newspaper and slicing into incredibly
narrow strips with a butcher’s knife, then attempting to read an article by
inspecting each piece of confetti sideways and trying to figure out what piece
of which letter is featured on each of its one-millionth-of-a-millimeter wide
strips. It’s hard to describe—I’m sure it was even harder than that to
invent—but the videos referenced above do a yeoman’s job of making it sound
almost simple. And so, from a lump of ancient animal skin long since fused into
a charbroiled rock, the team in Kentucky, working with teams from the Israel
Antiquities Authority and the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, managed to
produce this:
And,
of course, they managed not only to “unwrap” it (that is actually what they
call the process: “virtual unwrapping”), but to read it as well: it turned out
to be the earliest biblical text featuring the so-called Masoretic text that is
the “official” text of Scripture that we read aloud weekly in synagogue and preserves
the text we know as Leviticus 1:1-9 and 2:1-11.
How old is it exactly? Very old! The original carbon-14 dating effort
yielded a date around 300 CE, but the Hebrew script itself suggests an even
earlier date to some. Ada Yardeni, one
of the world’s experts in ancient Hebrew script, wrote in an essay that
appeared in the journal Textus, for example, that she felt confident
assigning it a date in the first century CE, a date seconded by Emanuel Tov,
another leading voice in the field. And the fact that the scroll—which appears
to have originally featured only Leviticus, not the entire Torah—mirrors “our”
text exactly is key.
Until
now, the oldest biblical texts were the ones discovered at Qumran, the
so-called Dead Sea Scrolls, and at other nearby sites like the Wadi Murabbaat,
but these texts deviate in thousands of ways from the “received” text that the
synagogue promotes as the correct, authentic text of the Torah. But it was hard
to argue that point persuasively when all the oldest manuscripts deviated in a
thousand details, most admittedly picayune nonetheless real, and there simply was
no evidence of “our” text being extant in earliest times. Nor was this just
a point for scholars in
graduate-school seminar rooms to debate—Judaism as we know it is the religion
the rabbis of classical antiquity developed based on their elaboration of the
law as found in Scripture, but their techniques of elaboration were often based
on interpreting the most minor discrepancies between parallel or adjacent
texts…and obviously rests on the fundamental assumption that the text of the
Torah with which they were working was “the” sacred text so fixed and so
invariable that it made sense to interpret even slight discrepancies between
twinned or adjacent passages.
But
now we actually do have evidence that the text that the Masoretes promoted as
“the” received text was out there precisely when the rabbinic movement was
getting off the ground in the first century CE, that the text we regard as
“the” text of “the” Torah was in use precisely when the rabbis began their
endless work of interpretive exegesis and created Judaism as we know it. This is a huge discovery and constitutes a
similarly huge validation of perhaps the most basic assumption of all regarding
the text of the Torah: that the text we read weekly in synagogue is the precise
text the ancients studied and promoted as the basis for the purposeful worship
of God through the medium of obedience to the commandments of Scripture.
Professor
Marc Z. Brettler of Duke University published an essay setting forth the
reasons he finds this Ein Gedi scroll to be of the greatest importance and I
recommend that work to you as an excellent place to begin reading. You can find
that article, which appeared on the thetorah.com website last fall, by clicking
here.
Good follow-up pieces to look at would be Daniel Estrin’s article published on
The Times of Israel website (click here) or
Nicholas Wade’s piece in the New York Times last September (click here).
The
technique perfected at the University of Kentucky will now be used to unlock
countless other treasures preserved physically but until now deemed unopenable,
unreadable, and unusable. Prime among
those up-until-now unrecoverable treasures is the vast library of charred,
fused scrolls—more than 300 of them—found back in 1752 at Herculaneum in Italy,
a smaller town destroyed in 79 CE by the same volcanic eruption that
annihilated Pompeii, in a villa that scholars believe belonged to Julius
Caesar’s father-in-law. Those scrolls were acquired by (of all people) Napoleon
and given to the Institut de France in Paris, where they now reside…mute for
millennia and now ready, perhaps, finally to speak.
Who
knows what other treasures this new technique will yield? The Herculaneum
scrolls alone could produce dozens of unknown texts from antiquity, but for me
personally the virtual opening of the Ein Gedi scroll will always be of primary
importance. We know such much, but also so little about Jewish antiquity.
Regular readers will know this as a key concept for me personally: how little and
how much we know about the past, and how we must learn to balance those two
thoughts rationally and reasonably. The library of ancient Jewish texts is
voluminous…but also filled with gigantic lacunae. We have almost no records of
actual synagogue life, for example. We have no ancient prayerbooks to consult,
no minutes of public meetings, no documents relating to the inner workings of
the schools that produced the documents that we revere as the “stuff” of
rabbinic Judaism. Why the synagogue at Ein Gedi owned a scroll that featured
the Book of Leviticus alone none can say. Did they read from it during the
service? That would certainly not be what we would expect by reading rabbinic
documents that require that the Torah be read from a full scroll featuring all
five of the Torah’s constituent books! But the rabbis did not control the
synagogues of Roman Palestine any more than rabbis today control the synagogues
in whose pulpits they serve today. Was the scroll used for study? That seems
more likely, or at least as likely. But why was it stored then in a
synagogue? Was the synagogue a school? (We regularly call a synagogue a shul
in Jewish American English, generally glossing by the strangeness of
referring to one institution by a word that literally denotes another.) Did
single-book scrolls circulate in antiquity long before the text of Scripture
was available in what we would call books or the ancient prototypes of modern
books? Where could you buy such a thing? Were there public libraries? Did
ordinary people own such scrolls? Were they somehow part of private worship, as
opposed to the public reading of the Torah as part of the worship service? And
what of this specific scroll? Who wrote it? Who owned it? Who used it?
And why, after the conflagration that destroyed the synagogue and burnt its
scrolls, did no one bury this specific scroll? Was that just an
accident? Or is the story, now lost forever, far more complex and interesting
than one of mere happenstance? To none of these questions do scholars
have anything at all like definitive answers.
And
so the Ein Gedi scroll, now that it speaks, prompts far more questions than it
answers. But it is through the contemplation of just such objects that we grow
wise as we look back and remind ourselves, not how much, but how little we know
of the past. The study of history has the capacity to make us arrogant; far
more reasonably should it make us humble. And yet there is strange power in old
things: contemplating this ancient scroll—even without feeling in awe of the
technology that made it readable—reminds us of just how long people have been gathering
on Shabbat morning to hear the Torah read aloud…and allows us just for a moment
to step out of time and join the worshipers in the old Ein Gedi synagogue and,
as we sit quietly and contemplate the scene unfolding around us, to espy a
slender scroll on a wooden shelf in a rickety bookcase on the shul’s
southern wall and, alone among the others present, to know something of its
fate.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.