This Sunday is
the seventy-sixth anniversary of Kristallnacht, the Reich-wide pogrom that in
the minds of many signaled the beginning of the Shoah…or, at the very least,
the beginning of the last chapter in the story of European Jewry on the eve of
its annihilation. Used to marking the day since most of us were children, it
might be interesting to pause for a moment to ask why exactly it is that this specific
day has retained its draw on the consciousness of world Jewry. There is,
after all, a Holocaust Memorial Day that is observed each spring on the 27th
of Nisan, a week or so after Passover. That day, chosen originally to
commemorate the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising of 1943 but then moved to a date later
in the month to avoid conflicting with the observance of Passover, is our
annual opportunity to remember the martyrs and pay honor to those who found the
courage and had the opportunity to resist.
(The actual uprising in Warsaw began on Erev Pesach in 1943, as the
Jewish world outside of Europe was preparing to sit down for its traditional seder
meals.) So why have we doubled up
our observance and added a second Yom Hashoah, as it were, in the fall?
You could say
that the question itself is flawed, that Kristallnacht is not really anything
like Yom Hashoah. It’s not a real holiday, for one thing, not even in
Israel. Everybody goes to work. Schools are open. There are no specific
observances, rituals, or prayers that have been developed to assist the Jewish
world in its effort to commemorate the day. Nor has there been any effort, as
far as I know, even to take note of the day in the context of our daily prayers…and
this from a people that reacts liturgically to the weather in Israel. And yet,
despite the fact that we have done nothing at all to make Kristallnacht into
anything more than a day on the calendar to be noted in passing, the day itself
somehow refuses to vanish from our consciousness…and, despite our best efforts
to ignore it, remains as a kind of thorn in our side, or perhaps more exactly
as a kind of pebble in our collective shoe: something we find irritating and
upsetting to have to deal with, yet which we seem unable just to forget about
and move past instead of endlessly dwelling on.
The numbers
more than justify our obsession. A thousand synagogues destroyed in a single
night. More than seven thousand businesses either totally or partially
destroyed. Ninety-one Jews murdered. Thirty-one thousand arrested and
sent to concentration camps. An uncountable number of Jewish homes, schools,
hospitals, cemeteries, and communal offices ransacked. Buildings can only stand
if they are set on foundations that can support their weight. In my mind, Kristallnacht—the date marking
the open, unabashed descent of Germany into the realm of the truly
demonic—Kristallnacht itself is the foundation on which the death camps
were built. As we pause to ponder
Kristallnacht on this strange year with the seventieth anniversary of the
liberation of Treblinka behind us and the seventieth anniversary of the
liberation of Auschwitz still to come in January, the seventy-sixth anniversary
of the “night of broken glass” takes on its own dismal poignancy.
Among my more
guilty reading pleasures are the books of Edgar Rice Burroughs. The author of
almost eighty novels and one of America’s bestselling authors of all time with
an estimated 100 million books in print, Burroughs is best known today
for his series of twenty-five books about Tarzan, the prince of the jungle originally
known as John Clayton, the Viscount Greystoke. Somewhere along the way, I think
I read them all. (In the 1984 movie, Greystoke, Tarzan was upgraded to earl,
presumably on the assumption that most Americans wouldn’t know what a viscount was.)
The basic story, I’m sure we all know at least more or less. Tarzan’s British
parents are marooned on the west coast of Africa after surviving a mutiny on
board their ship. Soon thereafter, his mother dies of some mysterious illness
and his father is killed by Kerchak, the leader of a tribe of
super-intelligent, highly socialized apes into which the baby viscount is adopted. And there, among the Mangani (Kerchak’s tribe
of apes, one wholly unknown to Western zoologists), the infant, now called
Tarzan, is raised by Kerchak himself and his ape-wife, Kala. (Just for the
record, it’s taken me this long to realize how funny it is that Kerchak’s bride
is named Kala.) Several of the books focus on Tarzan’s unusual adolescence (and
to call it unusual is really to say the very least). But then he eventually
does grow up, and it is as a young feral man that Tarzan makes the acquaintance
of an American woman, Jane Porter, who coincidentally has been marooned on the
exact same beach on which Tarzan’s own parents washed up twenty years earlier.
Eventually, Jane finds a way to return to the United States and Tarzan,
smitten, follows her. One thing leads to another and after some time they marry
and, at least in some of the books, move to England, where they have a son,
Jack, to whom they also give the ape-name Korak. Things, however, do not work
as planned and, unable to stand the hypocrisy of civilization, Tarzan, Jane,
and Jack eventually return to Africa to settle there and have even more
adventures.
I loved those
books as a teenager, even preferring them to the series of twelve movies
featuring Johnny Weismuller made between 1932 and 1948 but shown endlessly on
television when I was growing up. But their recurring theme—just how paper-thin
the veneer of civilization, and particularly Western civilization, really
is—now feels ominous to me, and particularly as we prepare to take note yet
again of the anniversary of Kristallnacht. It was Burroughs himself who made up
the phrase “the thin veneer of civilization,” in fact, and he used it
repeatedly in his books, beginning with The Return of Tarzan in
1912. But it could not apply more aptly
here, as we contemplate not just any country, but one of the most
supremely civilized, cultured nations of the world—a nation that gave birth to
the finest composers and philosophers, to linguists and poets, to scientists
and to artists—turning almost overnight not just to anti-Semitism, but
to a barbaric version of racial hatred so intensely brutal as to be almost
unimaginable even in retrospect.
There
is no better place to begin reading about Kristallnacht than Martin Gilbert’s Kristallnacht:
Prelude to Destruction, published by HarperCollins in 2006. It is, to say
the least, grim reading as the author chronicles the destruction, the murder of
elderly Jews, the degradation of Jewish women in particular, and the rest of
the horrors that occurred on that one evil night. But somehow the contemporary accounts,
written by reporters and others present on the ground in Germany who even then
could not possibly have imagined Treblinka, are chilling in an especially
unsettling way. Hugh C. Greene, for example,
published an account of his own experiences in Berlin on Kristallnacht in the Daily
Telegraph just two days after the fact: “Mob
law ruled in Berlin throughout the afternoon and evening and hordes of
hooligans indulged in an orgy of destruction. I have seen several anti-Jewish
outbreaks in Germany during the last five years, but never anything as nauseating
as this. Racial hatred and hysteria seemed to have taken complete hold of
otherwise decent people. I saw fashionably dressed women clapping their hands
and screaming with glee, while respectable middle-class mothers held up their
babies to see the ‘fun.’” It’s hard to
know how to respond to a paragraph like that. Or rather, it’s not that hard at
all.
At
least for me personally, watching over all of this is Tarzan himself, dressed
up like a member of the landed gentry but never forgetting that he personally has
come to symbolize what he learned in the jungle before he met Jane: that it’s
all a façade, all the thinnest of patinas…that civilization itself is the
flimsiest of cloth covers masking the demonic potential that lies buried in the
darkest recesses of the human soul….and that that thinnest of cloths can fall
to the ground and reveal the beast within as soon as society lets down its
guard even slightly.
You
can see signs of this truth almost everywhere if you find the courage to look
straight on without turning away. You could easily have seen it in the streets
of Paris last summer, when what was billed as a pro-Palestinian march degenerated
almost without warning into a frenzied mob of anti-Semitic thugs chasing Jews
off the street, attacking a local synagogue, and calling—not for a revision of
this or that Israeli policy vis-à-vis Gaza—but for blood, the blood of the Jews
of France. You can see it when patrons line up to buy tickets for an opera
featuring Nazi-style invective against Jews so they can “decide for themselves”
whether the production has merit instead of being, as civilized people would
and should be, repulsed by the idea even of contributing to the success
of such a production. And you can certainly see it for yourself on the campuses
of American universities, where the demonization of Israel and the portrayal of
the Palestinians as the victims of Israeli imperialism regularly spills over
into rank, undiluted anti-Semitism directed at Jewish students regardless of
their personal politics. (I was shocked—truly shocked—just recently to read a recent
piece by Melanie Phillips, a columnist for the Times of London called “As I See
It: The Academic Intifada,” which sketches out the extent to which America’s
campuses have become infected with overt anti-Semitism in a way that even a
decade ago would have seemed somewhere between implausible and impossible. If
you are reading this electronically, click here
to read her essay.) So, in the end, Tarzan really did have it right: it’s all
the thinnest of patinas behind which we pretend to be safe…and, slightly
paradoxically, the degree to which we own up to that unpalatable truth is the
degree to which we will be able to withstand the onslaught when the patina
dissolves, as it occasionally must and does, and we are left staring at what
lies exposed behind its no-longer-existent opacity.
And
that, I think, is why the Tarzan stories are so appealing, because in a sense
they are just book-length midrashic elaborations of this one specific idea:
that the thin veneer of civilization can crack at any moment, that the demonic
is never that far from the surface, that there is no point of
diminishing returns when it comes to being on guard for signs that the veil is
slipping, the patina dissolving, or the veneer cracking. Kristallnacht is that
midrash set to history…and I believe that it is precisely for that reason that
we find it so impossible to look away…or not to pause on the awful night
to remember what happened seventy-odd years earlier to people who, just like
ourselves, thought of themselves as citizens not of Tarzan’s jungle, but
of the most sophisticated, civilized, cultured country ever to exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.