Last week, I invited readers to join me in peering through
the mist to catch a glimpse of King Kohelet stepping up to take his place on
the debaters’ stage amidst the top dozen people vying for the Democratic
nomination and then to join me in imagining what he might have had to say if he
had been there in person and not merely as a figment of our collective imagination.
I tried to come up with several distinct lessons he might well have wished to
teach, but all turned out to be variations on the same theme: that humility is
the surest sign of wisdom and that, therefore, the least qualified leader or
would-be leader will almost always be the individual the most of sure of him or
herself, the proudest of his or her accomplishments, and the most certain that
no one could possibly know more or do better than him- or herself. And then,
life occasionally actually imitating art, I opened the
newspaper the other day and found myself reading about a scientific study published
just last summer in the journal Current
Directions in Psychological Research that detailed the latest
thinking on degree to which humility is not merely a virtue (like patience or generosity)
but rather a critical personality trait that truly mentally healthy people
cannot do without. (The original journal article has to be purchased—and for an
exorbitant $35—to be read on- or off-line, but to see the New York Times article
by Benedict Carey about the journal piece, click here.)
It makes sense too: in a world of highly polarized attitudes
towards everything, people possessed of the kind of humility highlighted in the
study turned out to be less dogmatic, less judgmental, less aggressive, and
less likely to fall prey to what the author calls ideological or political
polarization. They’re also less likely to fail in their committed
relationships—which only makes sense given the need for compromise in such
relationships. Perhaps even more to the point, the study found that the humble
among us are more likely to have the psychological resources “to shake off
grudges, suffer fools patiently, and forgive” themselves for inadvertent
missteps or errors of judgment. In that regard, I can also recommend a very
interesting essay by Peter Wehner that came out in 2017 (click here) about the worth of humility from
a spiritual point of view. (Wehner writes specifically in Christian terms, but
Jewish readers will find his views very resonant and highly applicable to
themselves.)
I have my own odd relationship with the concept. One of my
own culture heroes, although not one I’ve written much about in this space,
lived in Spain a cool thousand years ago in the first half of the eleventh
century. And, as the author of the first Jewish book devoted solely to ethics
and ethical issues, he deserves to be far more famous than he actually is.
There are a few reasons for this. First, my guy, Bahya ben Joseph ibn Pakuda,
is regularly confused—including by people who should certainly know better—with
Bahya ben Asher ibn Halawa, who lived about two and a half centuries later, and
who became known as one of the greatest biblical commentators of his day. So
maybe it was inevitable that the two Bahya’s would get confused with each other,
but it’s a shame that that happens: Bahya ben Asher was insightful, creative,
and intelligent, but Bahya ibn Pakuda was one of the handful of true greats: a
giant in terms of his incisive intellect, his ability to synthesize diverse
material, his literary ability…and the humility he brought to his writing desk
even when working on a book that he could not possibly have imagined readers a
millennium later still
considering
novel, interesting, and not even slightly stale. And then there’s the matter of
language: Bahya wrote not even
in regular
Arabic or in Hebrew, but in Judeo-Arabic, the specific dialect of Arabic spoken
by the Jews of Spain during what we in our day have taken to reference as the
Golden Age of Spanish Jewry. So that means his book is read today in its
original language by more or less no one at all.
When I first began to read Jewish classics, I was still in
college. And in my junior year, which I slightly unexpectedly spent in France
studying Hebrew, I found myself in a class devoted to reading the 1950
French-language translation by André Chouraqui. After a few weeks, I was
completely in his thrall. To say that Bahya became my only friend that year is to
exaggerate. (I wasn’t that
lonely.) But
he was a real (if spectral) presence in my life that year…and a very supportive
one at that. I don’t know where other people read Bahya, but I read him each
night before bed. And I carried his book around with me too, pausing to read a
few paragraphs whenever the opportunity presented itself. What can I say?
Friends hang out together! (Maybe I really was that lonely.)
It was from Bahya that I learned about humility as something
to be cultivated and sought after. In the sixth chapter of his book, which is
wholly concerned with the topic, he writes that “one should always show
humility toward others and divest oneself of all pride for the sake of showing honor
to God, casting off all sense of loftiness, all arrogance and self-importance…both
in private and in the midst of a crowd.” And then he goes on to explain how
Scripture makes a point of requiring this particularly of people in leadership
positions. And now we get to my point for the week.
Aaron, for example, was the High Priest of all Israel—but he
was not above cleaning the ashes off the altar each morning and delivering them
to the dump personally as a way of reminding himself to avoid haughtiness and
arrogance. Similarly, the Bible reports that when the Holy Ark was finally
brought into the City of David, King David himself offered up the
burnt-offerings and danced in the street to remind himself that, when all was
said and done, he was just as unworthy to sit on the throne of Israel as any
other mortal would also have been.
And then Bahya goes on to describe the true leader
specifically in terms of the degree to which such a person successfully
cultivates a sense of natural humility, speaking as little as possible, declining
ever to pontificate in public, always avoiding vulgar language, never behaving
in a tawdry, tasteless, or crude way in front of others, and instantly intervening
when someone is being treated unjustly. True leaders, he goes on, always seek to avoid public praise and
never pass up an opportunity to own up to their own moral or ethical errors. “Such
people,” Bahya writes, “never blame the ones who blame them (for
having done things that they did in fact do), nor would they ever be angry with
whomever uncovered the misdeed in question. On the contrary, the true leaders
will always say to an accuser, ‘O my friend, what is this evil act of mine that
you know of in comparison to those of which you are ignorant and which have
been concealed by God for my sake for such a long time? Were my deeds and sins
known to you, you would run away….” That, Bahya says, is what it means to
embrace humility as a personal virtue...and to qualify as a national leader.
What would our American landscape be like if the people
vying for political office were to take these words to heart—actively seeking
forgiveness for past missteps, owning up to an inability to know with certainty
where any chosen path will eventually lead, openly admitting ignorance and
shortsightedness, and actively—and vigorously—seeking the counsel of the wise
when decisions have to be made instead of relying solely on an inflated sense
of their own ability magically to know the unknowable? I can answer that
question myself: a lot more appealing and a lot healthier than the endless
contest we now endure to see which candidate or would-be candidate can speak
with more brazen certainty about the future, can be more disdainful of his or
her rivals’ points of view and opinions, and who can be as little self-effacing
as possible in an attempt to convince the undecided voter to choose him or her
as our nation’s next leader.
Bahya’s book is almost a full thousand years old. Its author
has been gone from the world for almost that long. His precise dates are
unknown, as is the site of his grave and the details of his personal life—whom
he married, how many children he had, what became of them, etc. He is hardly
known to the non-Jewish world at all, but even within the world of Jewish
letters there are only very few who can say that they have read his book from
beginning to end even once, let alone many times. If only our would-be leaders
were among them!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.