Despite the fact that it was only
in 1863 that President Lincoln issued a presidential proclamation making Thanksgiving
into an annual national holiday to be celebrated on the third Thursday of
November, the holiday itself is much older and many presidents, starting with
President Washington in 1789, had earlier on proclaimed national festivals of thanksgiving
on a year-to-year basis. Nor was this a new idea even in George
Washington’s day: as everyone who ever attended an American elementary school
knows, the first Thanksgiving was observed in 1621 by the Pilgrims of the
Plymouth Plantation in Plymouth, Massachusetts. But the story as taught to
children in our country masks the two crucial details which, more than paradoxically,
are precisely the ones that we should be brining to the fore today and which
have the ability, I think, to grant the festival ultimate meaning for Americans
today.
In 1621, the Pilgrims were not
having an easy time of it. The Plymouth Colony had only been established one single
year earlier. But life here in these future United States was wholly unlike
what the Pilgrims knew from England and by 1621 it was apparently clear to
almost all that the newcomers were unlikely to survive at all, let alone to
thrive, in the New World unless they found a way successfully to adapt to their
new environment. For a while they looked only within their only ranks for the
help they so desperately needed. And then a native man named Squanto, a member
of the Patuxet tribe native to what is now eastern Massachusetts, stepped onto
the stage to teach the newcomers what they needed to know. He taught them how
to catch eel, for one thing. He taught them how to deal with winter weather conditions
that was far more harsh than what they knew from back home. And, most crucially
of all, he taught them how to grow corn.
Squanto, having learned English
the hard way (he had earlier been enslaved in England and had managed to escape
and travel back home), then went on to become the Pilgrims’ interpreter and,
more crucially, to serve as a liaison between them and King Massasoit, the
leader of the Wampanoag tribe that had displaced the Patuxets as the leaders of
the local indigenes. (The Patuxet tribe is believed to have died out from some
sort of epidemic while Squanto was in England, thus making Squanto himself the
last of the Patuxets.) And it was this fledgling relationship that led to the
king donating large gifts of food to the fledgling colony of Europeans, which
act of generosity and largesse led in turn to the 1621 feast of thanksgiving
that became enshrined in American lore as the first Thanksgiving of all.
It wasn’t exactly like our
holiday. For one thing, it lasted for three days. For another, turkey was only
one small item on the menu, which (as preserved by Governor Bradford himself in
his book On Plymouth Plantation, which I read years ago and can recommend as fascinating and
engaging even today) consisted of cod, eels, bass, clams, lobster, mussels,
duck, geese, swans, turkey, venison, berries, squash, pumpkin, peas, beans, and
corn.
Eventually the custom of
recreating that feast caught on even among non-English communities in the New
World. The Dutch of New Netherlands, for example, proclaimed a first Thanksgiving
feast just a few decades later in 1644, then intermittently until 1674 when New
Netherlands stopped existing after the entire colony was ceded to the British
in the Treaty of Westminster.
But somehow a key element in the
story managed to be forgotten: that this was not a meal prepared by the
Pilgrims to give thanks for the bounty of the land on which they had settled,
but a meal intended to express their thanks both to Squanto, their volunteer
ambassador to King Massasoit, and to Massasoit himself, the native monarch who
saved them from almost certain extinction.
We tend to think of Thanksgiving
as a time to be grateful for all the good in our lives. That is surely a noble
sentiment, but how much more meaningful would the holiday be if we were also to
allow our celebratory mood to bring to the fore a sense of deep beholdenness to
the native people who created the context for one of the first European settlements
to survive more than a single year in their newly chosen homeland. Would King
Massasoit have behaved differently had he somehow been granted some sort of
prescient understanding of the degree to which European settlement in North
America was going to bring about the near annihilation of native life in his
place and if he could have been allowed somehow to see—even if just in his
mind’s eye—the instances of wholesale slaughter and deportation that were going
to characterize relations between the descendants of the newly arrived settlers
and the native people already on the ground here in North America? I’ll leave
that question unanswered, but will suggest that Thanksgiving should be a time for
all of us to ponder the detail that the most famous of all settler encampments,
the Plymouth Plantation itself, only survived because the native people they
found in place when they arrived reached out to them kindly, magnanimously, and
generously. For most of us, Thanksgiving is mostly about gratitude; my
suggestion is that it also be about hospitality, charity, and kindness
to strangers.
But what of the Pilgrims
themselves? Their story too is almost always mistold, its “real” lesson thus
either obfuscated slightly or totally.
Plymouth Plantation was founded
in 1620—only Jamestown was older—and its independent existence ended in 1691
when it was included in the newly formed Massachusetts Bay Colony. But the
Pilgrims themselves have somehow managed to live on in our national imagination
as icons of religious freedom. Indeed, most Americans connect the Pilgrims’ journey to the New World with their quest for religious freedom and imagine
that that specific virtue—the natural right of all to worship in accordance
with the dictates of their own consciences—was what the Pilgrims must surely have
been the most thankful for as they sat down to their eels and berries.
Here too, however, the story line
matches reality only vaguely. The Pilgrims belonged to a very strict Protestant
sect that followed John Calvin’s teaching that God offers redemption solely to
those ready to embrace the specific version of Christianity preached by Calvin
himself, whereas the rest of the human race was imagined to exist merely to
experience God’s wrath for their sins. Calvin’s theology was less simple than
I’ve just made it sound, but the bottom line is that the Pilgrims, driven from
their homeland by relentless persecution, responded to their own past by embracing
a set of beliefs that denied religious freedom to anyone not precisely like
them. So as we gather at our groaning boards on Thanksgiving, it should be to
reject, not celebrate, the Pilgrims’ own understanding of religious freedom as something
deserved solely by them themselves and substitute for it a sense of religious
freedom far more akin to the kind enshrined in the First Amendment to the
Constitution.
Freedom of religion is not an
ancient value. Indeed, the notion that there is virtue in permitting even the
smallest and least popular spiritual disciplines to flourish would have struck
most in older times as somewhere between peculiar and wholly unacceptable. Although
there were some precedents to the kind of spiritual freedom enshrined in the
Bill of Rights—and in unexpected places and times like, for example, India in
the third century BCE—our Founding Fathers were basically staking out new
territory when they forbade the government from establishing a state religion
or from erecting any untoward barrier to religious worship in any legitimate
mode at all. For that, we should be eternally grateful. And we should enjoy
Thanksgiving, therefore, by emphasizing the fine and noble idea of religious
freedom not as the Pilgrims understood it but as we ourselves do.
And those are my twin suggestions
for Thanksgiving this year: that we think back to old King Massasoit and ponder
how the future of the American nation once depended on the unearned hospitality
showed by a native leader to newcomers in search of refuge from persecution and
that we think back to the harsh legacy of the original beneficiaries of the
benevolence shown them by the king of the Wampanoags and ponder how challenging
it truly is to be in favor of religious freedom not only for oneself and
one’s own faith group but for all citizens…including those whose spiritual
beliefs are unfamiliar or even totally unrelated to our own.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.