The prize for Scripture’s least
celebrated rhetorical question should probably go to Zechariah ben Berechia ben
Iddo, one of the three prophets who presided over the initial stages of
Israel’s mid-sixth century BCE return to Zion after captivity in Babylon.
Looking out at the unfinishedness
that characterized basically everything his eye could see—the so-far-only-partially-rebuilt
walls of Jerusalem, the so-far-unsuccessful effort to rebuild the Temple and
turn it into a functioning place of worship, the so-far-fruitless effort to
place a scion of the House of David on the throne of Israel, and the so-far-failed
effort to bring the descendants of the original exiles en masse back to
the Jewish homeland and there to re-establish themselves, if not quite as a
free people in its own place, then at least as a semi-autonomous ethnicity
within the vast reaches of the Persian Empire—looking out at all that (and
possibly remembering his older prophet-colleague’s promise that theirs was to
be a day of “wholly new things”), the prophet acidulously asks his best
question. Mi baz l’yom k’tanot? Are you really going to disrespect our
moment in history as a nothing but a yom k’tanot, as “a day of small
things” and negligible accomplishments?
It won’t matter in the long run,
he promises, because the naysayers and scoffers will eventually all abandon
their pessimism and rejoice in the nation’s future successes in all of
the above undertakings. And, the prophet adds, the eyes of God are truly
trained on the people at this specific juncture in their history, taking it all
in and watching to see whether the people can summon up the will to do the
right thing, to persevere, to keep at it…even despite the overwhelming nature
of each single one of the tasks facing it. And who can say that small successes
won’t turn into big ones? If I can summon up optimism in the face of the overwhelming
nature of the tasks facing us all, the prophet almost says out loud, so why
shouldn’t you also feel at least slightly hopeful? Is that really asking too
much?
It’s one of my favorite passages
in all the prophetic books, bringing together all my favorite COVID-era themes:
guilt, irony, hope, resilience, and courage. And this truly is a day of small
things, of small advances that feel unimportant in the larger picture. Last
week, I wrote to you all about the dangers of magical thinking. This week, I’d
like to write about a different danger facing us all: the danger of sinking
into depression born of what we perceive to be realism, of doing precisely what
the prophet forbade: being dismissive of small things because they aren’t big
things, thus missing the opportunity to build on what already exists and, at
least possibly, make small accomplishments into large ones.
The plague has taken a lot from
each of us and some things from us all. Pleasures that once seemed have-able
merely for the asking—heading out with a friend for a walk or a coffee
somewhere, successfully finding an hour in an otherwise jammed week to work out
at the gym, or to go for a swim, or to stop by the kids’ place to take the
grandkids for an unexpected ice cream—even these simplest of life’s pleasures
have all been taken from us. And yet these horrific weeks in which deaths in
New York State have almost hit the 30,000 mark (of which almost 2,000 in Nassau
County alone), these weeks that have taken so much from us and made us afraid
to turn on the news at night lest we hear even more bad news, these
weeks have also brought us small things—Zechariah’s k’tanot—to be
grateful for.
There are lots of things I could
mention. The curve has clearly flattened. At least some of the most dramatic efforts
to deal with COVID—the transformation of the Javits Center into a US Army-run COVID
hospital, for example, or the setting up of a field hospital for COVID patients
in Central Park—have been abandoned as local hospitals have become more able to
deal with all the COVID patients who require hospitalization. The
transformation of society—something I once thought Americans, and particularly
New Yorkers, would balk at taking seriously—feels almost completely successful:
I went for my daily 2-mile walk yesterday and do not believe I passed a single
person in the street who wasn’t wearing a protective mask. We’ve all learned
how to deal with risks that must be taken—learning how to go shopping at 6 AM,
for example, or how to order groceries without venturing into a grocery store—and
the disruption feels, to me at least, minimal. Yes, these are all small things.
Yes, well over 80,000 Americans have died in the course of the last few months.
Yes, almost 1.4 million Americans have been confirmed as COVID-ill,
which number is definitely far too low since, as of today, a mere 9,623,336
Americans have been tested for the virus…out of a population of over
331,000,000. Yes to all the above! But mi baz l’yom k’tanot? Are we
really going to look past the successes because they are, in the end, our
latter-day version of the prophet’s small things? It wasn’t a good idea in
ancient times. And it’s not a good plan for today either.
I have lately sought solace in
familiar places. You all know that I read a lot, that reading is my refuge from
the world, my go-to place when I need to withdraw for a bit from the maelstrom
and regroup internally and intellectually. It’s been that way with me my whole
life, even when I was a boy and certainly when I was a teenager. And in this
way too the boy became the father to the man—but it’s the direction of my
reading that the age of COVID has altered. I’m usually all about new fiction.
In my usual way I will share with my readers—possibly in this very space—an
account of the books I have read in the past year and recommend as summer
reading. And I’ve read some new authors this year that I’m eager to share with
you all—American authors like Richard Morais or Madeline Miller, but also writers
from more exotic climes like Cixin Liu, Yrsa Sigurdardottir, or Daniel Kehlmann.
For the last few weeks, however, I’ve been finding solace and calm by returning
to some familiar places and expanding those specific horizons slightly.
I somehow realized that I had
read all of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novels but one, so I found and read a copy of
his first book, Fanshawe, a work he was later on so ashamed of that he personally
bought up all the unsold copies he could find and burned them in his own oven.
That led me to notice that I had read all of Herman Melville’s novels (regular
readers of these letters will know how great a fan I am) except for The
Confidence Man (his last novel other than the unfinished Billy Budd),
so I read that too. And now I have moved on to Mark Twain.
I am among those who think of Huckleberry
Finn as the single greatest American novel. Like most people my age, I
first read it when I was in high school. (I’m sure I had no real idea what it
was about, which was true of any number of books assigned to us back in the
day.) My idea was to re-read it, possibly after re-reading Tom Sawyer. But
then I began to realize just how many holes there were in my effort to read all
of Twain. It turns out there are “other” Tom Sawyer novels, books I don’t
recall even hearing about and am certain I never read. So I decided to read
them now…and then moved on to my current plan to read or re-read all of Twain.
And it’s working, too: the more I read of Twain, the more comfortable I’ve been
feeling, the more grounded, the more calm, the more ready to contextualize this
whole corona-thing and see it in the context of the larger pageant of life in
these United States over the last century and a half.
I began with The Prince and
the Pauper, yet another of Twain’s books I somehow never actually read. Does
reading the Classic Comics version count? Probably not. Nor should it matter
that I remember watching the book’s three-part adaptation on Walt Disney’s
Wonderful World of Color with my parents in 1962. Nor that I loved the 1977
movie version featuring Rex Harrison, Charlton Heston, Ernest Borgnine, George
C. Scott, Oliver Reed, and Raquel Welch, which was for some reason distributed
in the U.S. under the title, Crossed Swords. Twain didn’t write any of
the above: he wrote a novel, published it in 1882 (just after the birth of one
of my grandmothers and just before the other’s), and that is what I set myself
to read.
On the surface, it’s a funny
story about two eight-year-old boys, one the crown prince of England and the
other an impoverished beggar living with a violent, angry father, and about how
they manage (almost believably) to trade places and try on each other’s life
for size. It’s well done, too—lots of surprise plot twists and a very engaging
style that held my interest for as long as I was reading even despite the fact
that I knew how it ended. But on a deeper level, it’s about something else
entirely—about the nature of identity, about the question of whether you are
how you perceive yourself or how others
perceive you, about the fragility of individuality, and about the fluidity of
the sense of self we all take for granted when we look in the mirror and, seeing
ourselves looking back, take that experience as reflective of immutable
reality.
And, for readers in the age of
COVID, it’s also about finding a way to retain our sense of ourselves as unique
beings when the entire world changes on a dime, when the palace vanishes and
you find yourself suddenly on your own in a world you barely recognize, when you
wake up one morning and—for reasons even you yourself can’t really
fathom—nothing is as it was and your sole choice is between negotiating a brand
new normal or being left behind as the universe moves forward. It’s a clever
book about the nature of self-awareness, about the durable nature of personality,
about the ability of the background to alter the foreground—but also about the
limits that inhere in that ability when the people standing at the front of the
stage insist on maintaining their allegiance to their own personalities even
under the most peculiar and unforeseen circumstances.
If you’ve never read it, I
recommend Twain’s The Prince and the Pauper as a good place to
re-introduce yourself to one of our greatest authors. I plan to keep reading
too, and I’ll report back to you as I make progress. When summer comes, I’ll
share with you my recommendations for summer reading as I always do. But in the
meantime, it’s just me and Sam Clemens on my back porch when the afternoon
coffee is ready and I find the courage to turn my phone off for forty or fifty
minutes and step into the world of a great man’s imagination. Within the
context of appropriate social distancing, I invite you all to join me!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.