I
suppose I probably shouldn’t admit this, but I hadn’t ever heard of Kyrie
Irving until last week when he suddenly became famous even to people who don’t
follow basketball by encouraging his 17.5 million Instagram and 4.5 million Twitter
followers to take seriously a movie called Hebrews to Negroes: Wake Up Black
America that, among other things, promotes the theory that Black people were
the original Hebrews, that Jews worship Satan, and that the Holocaust didn’t
actually happen. This was not well received by the Nets, Irving’s NBA team,
which suspended him for five games to punish him for his bigotry. That didn’t
strike me as such a serious punishment, but it was apparently enough to prompt
an apology in which Irving acknowledged that the movie he was promoting “contained
some false anti-Semitic statements, narrative, and language that were untrue
and offensive to the Jewish Race/Religion” and in which he accepted “full
accountability and responsibility for his actions.” On the other hand, the
movie itself is now a bestseller on amazon.com. (Click here for details.)
Still,
the Irving story has at least a kind of a good ending: a bad statement followed
by contrition, apology, and an public acceptance of responsibility. But coming
on the heels of a similar incident regarding Kanye West, whom I actually had
heard of, the security that I’ve always felt as an American Jewish person
suddenly felt just slightly compromised. (Kanye West, now called Ye, has
embraced many different loony-tunes theories about the world, including some promoting
the notion that Black people are the “real” Jews and the old canard about, and
I quote, the “Jewish underground media mafia” that enslaves Black performers. He’s also occasionally spoken
positively about Adolph Hitler.)
Because of his remarks, his various commercial relationships with huge companies like Adidas, Vogue, and the Gap have
been terminated. (An article in Forbes reported that these losses have reduced
his personal wealth to a mere $400 million. That poor man!) West—Ye—is a complex, troubled personality, but his reach too is immense: he has 18.1 million
followers on Instagram, 31.4 million on Twitter, 1.3 million on TikTok, 8.69
million subscribers to his YouTube channel, and 345,000 followers on Facebook.
So to wave him away as a disturbed person with crazy ideas is seriously to
underestimate the damage such a person can do. Oh, and he also threatened
personally to go “death con 3 on Jewish people,” presumably a way of saying he is
preparing actually to start murdering Jews. (Click here to read a deft deconstruction of the phrase
“death con 3” by Philissa Cramer and Ron Kampeas that was published last week
on the Times of Israel website.)
Suddenly,
the topic feels almost ubiquitous. Two different Broadway shows, Tom Stoppard’s
play Leopoldstadt, and Alfred Uhry and Jason Robert Brown’s musical, Parade, are
both formally and forcefully about anti-Semitism and the violence it breeds. (Leopoldstadt
is basically a Shoah story set in Vienna; Parade is about the 1915 lynching of
Leo Frank in Marietta, Georgia, a suburb of Atlanta.) The fourth anniversary of the Pittsburgh massacre last week
inspired even more public rumination about the topic, as did also a whole
series of on-line stories about the resurgence of anti-Semitism here and abroad,
of which the essay on the Algemeiner website published this week entitled,
“London Jews Facing Spree of Anti-Semitic Attacks,” was just one among many. (Click here to read it.) As a sign of just how much press
coverage these various incidents have generated, former President Obama chose
to address the topic head-on in a campaign sweep through Pennsylvania last
weekend on behalf of Josh Shapiro (who will now become that state’s governor) and John Fetterman (who
also won and will now become one of Pennsylvania’s
senators).
For
actual Jewish people, the challenge is always to find the precise line between
underreacting and overreacting. This is not as easy as it sounds. That there
are people who harbor deep-seated bigoted opinions about Jewish people will
come as a surprise to no one who lives in the world and least of all to actual Jewish
people. Nor have we come to expect the world to isolate or, to use my least
favorite word, “cancel” people who express anti-Semitic opinions out loud. (Alice
Walker, author of The Color Purple, has openly expressed overtly anti-Semitic
opinions for years and has, as far as I can see, suffered no consequences at
all. For more on the topic, click here. Nor have they stopped teaching T.S. Eliot’s
poetry in American high schools. Or Ezra Pound’s.) As a result, we have learned
to tolerate a level of public abuse that other minorities would never accept.
But even that principled stoicism is difficult to evaluate: are we merely
accepting things as they are and making a conscious choice not to whine about
it or are we more accurately mimicking the Jews of Weimar Germany who too felt
virtuous ignoring the rising tide of anti-Semitism in their country until that
very tide overwhelmed them utterly and beyond tragically? In my heart, I have
to say I don’t know which is the right approach: at different moments, I seem
to embrace one or the other…but never with the whole heart I wish I could bring
to my decision in either direction. I’m basically always of two minds, always at
least slightly conflicted, never completely certain in which direction the
golden path forward actually lies. Welcome to my Jewish-American world!
There’s
also good news. Not only former President Obama, but countless others have
spoken out in the last few weeks against anti-Semitism—and that list includes
movie stars, famous musicians, politicians, athletes, and Christian
theologians. So that’s heartening. But the elimination—the principled anathematization—of anti-Semitism is going to
require a lot more than expressions of the encouraging sentiments by celebrities. To free our nation from anti-Jewish prejudice
will require something else entirely, something along the lines of the paradigm shift the Civil Rights movement brought about in
the middle of the last century with respect to Black people. Society does grow
forward, after all. But it does so in fits and starts by altering the way
people see the world and think about the world one by one. Looking away from slurs
or, worse, attempting to re-interpret them as humorous jabs surely meant to amuse rather than seriously to insult is not at all helpful. Being afraid to
ruffle feathers when a public personality says something negative about Jews,
also not. Strengthening our American Jewish community from within by raising
the level of culture, education, and familiarity with the classics of Jewish
literature and the giants of Jewish thought, on the other hand, would be a very
useful set of steps forward, one that would make it clear that Jewishness
exists today, as always, as a bulwark of culture and civilization against the
tides of incivility, barbarism, prejudice, ignorance, and discrimination that
seem constantly to threaten to engulf the world. But this cannot solely be an
in-house operation. If anti-Semitism is to become as wholly unacceptable in the
American square as anti-Black racism now is, the shift I have in mind is going to
have to originate, at least to a great extent, in the non-Jewish world.
There
is no real point to any attempt to stifle honest debate in the public square.
If someone of stature claims in public (falsely but convincingly) that Jews dominated the slave trade that brought
African slaves to America, that person has to be forced publicly either to
produce proof of that allegation or to apologize for spreading lies about Jews.
If someone with scores of millions of social media followers spreads the perfidious lie that the
Holocaust didn’t actually occur,
the correct response is not to deny that person his or her right to speak in
public, but to force that person to demonstrate the truth of those allegations
in a convincing way…or else to admit to having spread falsehoods to millions of
willing listeners and then accept the consequences of having spread that lie. There was a time when it was considered entirely
normal for people to speak disparagingly in public about all sorts of minority
groups, mostly definitely including people of color, gay people, and even
(although not precisely a minority) women. Those days are long past us. But expressing anti-Semitic
opinions is not an act of professional or reputational suicide in America the
way expressing racist views has long since become.
Or is it? Have we finally arrived the point at which even important celebrities are being called up for vulgar, anti-Semitic comments made intentionally and malevolently? The whole brouhaha in the course of these last weeks about Kyrie Irving and Kanye West is encouraging in the extreme in that regard. The challenge is specifically not to allow the momentum to die down as we yet again become “used” to slander. What the future will bring, who can say? But we can make a serious effort to create a society in which anti-Semitic tropes never pass for humor, in which unproven calumnies cannot simply be bandied about and then retracted under pressure, and in which anti-Jewish invective is treated as seriously as hate speech. The Kanye West and Kyrie Irving incidents are encouraging! But where we go from here, of course, remains to be seen.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.