Who are you, little man? I look into your sad eyes…and see only resolve not to share your secrets. But you’re out in the open now, in the sunlight. You won’t understand what the Internet is just quite yet, but you’re well featured on it…and that means that even though you obviously can’t see any of us, we can all see you. It’s sort of hard to explain. But it’s a good thing, mostly.
You really do look good for
someone your age. What? Yes, of course I understand that the end part your nose
is just missing-in-action and that your nose didn’t really look like that when
you were alive. Your chin too, obviously. But you still cut a rather dashing
figure, even without the bits and pieces that have fallen away over the
millennia. Nice hair, too! I like the cornrows on top and the ringlets on the
side. (In our world, only hasidim and the women in Jane Austen novels wear side
ringlets like that. On me, they wouldn’t look that good. But I like them on
you.) I have a beard too, by the way,
although mine reaches all the way up the side of my head to meet my sideburns and
yours looks like it just stops halfway up your face. But it’s actually sort of
cool that way, now that I take a second look. A little pasted-on looking maybe,
but still appealing.
While we’re being frank, your
mouth is a little crooked too—but maybe that was just the sculptor trying to
make you look regal. Yes, obviously, regal: you are wearing a golden
crown, aren’t you? Even I know what that means! And your crooked mouth is more
than made up for by your soulful eyes, my little friend. (Okay, okay, I’m done
with the little guy stuff—I know you weren’t really 2 inches tall, or
that your head wasn’t.) I suppose it’s unlikely we would have been friends had
we been each other’s contemporaries. (I don’t actually know any kings in this
world I inhabit and I suppose I probably wouldn’t have known any in yours
either.) But maybe we could have just hung out together sometimes anyway. When my
daughter Lucy was about eight or nine, she taught me how to braid hair. I was
pretty good at it too! So I’m sure I could learn how to do cornrows. You know
what, I bet we could have been pals.
*
He really is two inches tall. Or
at least his head is. And he really has spent the last three thousand or so
years underground, buried deep beneath the ruins of biblical Abel Beth Maacah, a
tel located just south of the Israeli-Lebanese line near the border town of
Metula, until he was unearthed just recently by a team of archeologists from
the Hebrew University and California’s Asuza Pacific University under the
supervision of Professor Naama Yahalom-Mack of the Hebrew University. And his
story clearly goes back that far as well. No one can say for sure who he is.
But that he was someone—that goes without saying. To read more about the
excavations that led to his discovery, click here.
Based on the datable detritus
amongst which he was found, it seems certain that King Whoever lived in the
ninth century BCE. In its day, Abel Beth Maacah was the Trieste of its day,
sitting at the spot where the borders of three powerful kingdoms met: the
Kingdom of Israel to the south, the Phoenician kingdom of Tyre to the west, and
the kingdom of Aram (with its capital at Damascus) to the east. The town is mentioned
a few times in the Bible, most notably in the Second Book of Samuel, where it
is the setting for the decapitation of one Sheva ben Bikhri, a Benjaminite who unsuccessfully
tried to stir up a rebellion against King David and who then, having sought
refuge in Abel Beth Maacah, was rewarded for his efforts by having his head cut
off and tossed over the wall into the waiting arms of David’s general Yoav, who,
delighted, promptly called off the siege of the city and sent his troops home
instead. What he did with Sheva’s head exactly is not recorded. (For readers
who can’t get enough, this story is retold in detail in my novel, Heads You
Lose.)
This, however, is definitely not
Sheva ben Bikhri’s head. For one thing, the crown guarantees that we are
looking at a king. For another, why would anyone make a bust of Sheva ben Bikhri,
a failed malcontent? So, a king. But which one? Presuming a ninth-century
monarch doesn’t cut down the field as much as you’d think: without going
outside the Bible, we have several reasonable possibilities to choose between.
The little guy could be King Ethbaal of Tyre, the father of our own Queen
Jezebel and father-in-law of King Ahab of Israel. For that matter, he could be King Ahab
himself. Or he could plausibly be one of Ahab’s two sons who reigned after him,
King Ahaziah or King Jehoram. Or he could be King Jehu, who seized power from
the House of Omri (to which Ahab and his sons belonged) by, among other things,
shooting an arrow through King Jehoram’s shoulder blades with such force that
it pierced his heart and exited his chest on the other side. Or it could be
King Ben Haddad or King Hazael of Damascus. All would be reasonable choices.
We’ll never know. The thought, though, that this is what an ancient king looked
like and probably an ancient Israelite one (the tel is the site of an ancient Israelite
city, after all)—that thought is remarkably attractive to me. I’ve read about
these guys my whole life. I’ve written about them too…but who ever thought I
would be able actually to see one of them?
That question is just a bit
misleading, however. For example, there actually is a portrait of King Jehu to compare our fellow
with, although not a particularly flattering one.
One of the most amazing
archeological finds of the nineteenth century was the discovery in 1846 by Sir
Austen Henry Layard of the so-called Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser, which he
found at a place called Nimrud in northern Iraq and which contains the oldest
known picture of a person mentioned in the Bible: none other than King Jehu
himself. We can be fairly certain, however, that this is not the portrait the
king himself would have chosen to be remembered by as it depicts him prostrate
before King Shalmaneser of Assyria as he offers him the tribute that is listed
in detail on the obelisk as well: “silver, gold, a golden bowl, a golden vase
with a pointed bottom, golden tumblers, tin, a staff [fit] for a king, and
spears.” (The concept of buying off superpowers with gifts to keep them from
swallowing your country into their empire is a very old one.) And here he is,
the king of Israel with his royal derrière higher off the ground than his royal
head as he kisses Shalmaneser III’s imperial feet and attempts to buy him off
with some really expensive presents:
Is that our guy? The hair is the
same, as is the beard (although it looks like it meets his sideburns here—but
surely that’s just a detail.) Why he’s wearing a smurf’s hat, who knows? But it
certainly could be our guy. Maybe his head was cold when he took his royal
crown off, which you obviously have to do when you beg the big guys to take the
money and leave your people alone!
There are remarkably few pictures
of ancient Israelites. In the throne room of King Sennacharib of Assyria, there
is a famous frieze depicting the Battle of Lachish, which pitted the Assyrians
against the Kingdom of Judah in 701 BCE and which the Assyrians won handily,
taking these two Judahite soldiers captive.
What the story with their hair
was, who can say? And how they got their beards to match seems even less easy
to imagine. To people my age, they will resemble most of all those type-ball things once featured in IBM Selectric typewriters. (Kids, ask your parents about
this: typewriters were something like printers, except you had to input each
word separately and couldn’t make any changes without having to type the whole
thing over again.) But, joking aside, there’s something serious here to
contemplate: the Bible talks endlessly about the Israelites, but this is what
they actually looked like. Does any of these guys look like someone you might
run into at a UJA reception? If you ignore their remarkably thick necks, they
somehow do. Also, nice moustaches!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.