When the Bard has melancholy Jacques step forward to remind the audience that “all the world’s a stage / and all the men and women, merely players,” the point is not that nothing that happens in the world has any real importance in the same way that nothing that happens on stage in a play really matters.
In the theater,
nothing ultimately matters because it’s all make-believe: when the show’s over,
the actors head for their dressing rooms, take off their costumes, put on their street
clothes, and go home
to their real lives. Even the people
killed on stage are fully resurrected in this magic manner: when the curtain
goes down, they wash the fake blood off their faces, send their tomato-juice
soaked outfits to the show’s laundry service, put on their blood-free (or
rather, tomato-juice-free) street clothes, and go home to their husbands or
wives or cats or whatever. But the Bard’s point is specifically not that
nothing that happens in the world matters, but that society functions in many
ways as though we were all part of a theatrical troop of players: people endlessly entering our stage and exiting it, behaving foolishly or wisely, interacting maturely or childishly,
successfully summoning up the courage to be brave or good or failing to find
the inner strength to behave virtuously at all. And this as well, the Bard
implies: as we wind our way through the years of our lives, we all have the
potential to transcend the role written for us by the all-seeing and
all-knowing Playwright whose magnum opus is human life itself and, even while
sticking to a script written by Another, investing enough of our own moral
selves in the roles we are called to play to make the part, somehow, our own.
That, as any theater critic will
agree, is specifically what makes some actors great
and others not, that specific ability to be true to the script and yet somehow also to be fully personally and
wholly idiosyncratically invested in the
role.
So that’s what the
Bard meant to say. What the Bard surely did not mean to say is that it is ever
morally justifiable to treat other people like pawns in a stage drama, like people
who have somehow accidentally stumbled onto a stage without even realizing that
there is a huge audience watching them and waiting for them to say a word,
without understanding that they have been cast as players in a drama of which
they haven’t ever heard, regarding the plot of which they have no idea, and the author of which they cannot name.
And that is the set
of thoughts I brought to my analysis of the decision of Governor DeSantis’ decision to spend Florida
taxpayers’ money unilaterally to round up fifty
refugees who landed in a state a thousand miles to the west of his own and then
to ship them to a third-state-destination so that the cold, unfeeling reception
he must have been sure they would receive could function as grist for his own
political mill, as proof positive that even those airy-fairy liberal types in,
of all places, Martha’s Vinyard, would become immigration hawks as soon as they
were faced with having to deal with actual refugees on their own turf and not merely by watching them on television as other people try to deal with what all sides
to the debate agree is an unmanageable situation as it now stands.
But that’s precisely
not what happened. The people in Martha’s Vinyard rose to the occasion nobly
and kindly, providing the newcomers with lodging and hot meals. AP Spanish
students from the local high school were pressed into service as amateur translators. Eventually, the government will have to decide what to
do with these people. But the people in the Vinyard, whose problem this could not possibly have been
less, responded decently and generously: they saw homeless newcomers in their midst and they did what normal people do when confronted with hungry, homeless people:
they fed them and found them lodging. What happens next is hardly their call.
But on the small-stage level, they responded just as decent, goodhearted people
always should: compassionately and
humanely. Good for them!
The Bard had a
point, but Jewish tradition takes a different tack: the whole world may well be
a stage, but the lives we live on that stage are better compared to a journey
than to the performance
of a play.
And that notion of life as a journey is at the heart of Sukkot, which begins
this Sunday evening.
The
other two pilgrimage festivals, Pesach and Shavuot, are tied in our tradition
to specific events: Passover to the actual night on which the Israelites
finally left Egypt and set forth on their journey to freedom, and Shavuot to
the great moment at Sinai when the people, for a long moment transformed into
prophets, heard God speak aloud the first ten commandments of the covenant that
would forever more bind the people Israel to its God. But Sukkot, the third
pilgrimage festival, is not tied to a specific event, but to a long, protracted
experience—the one of wandering in the desert for decades until finally arriving
at the boundary of the Promised Land.
The
rituals connected with Sukkot are reminiscent, each in its way, of this concept
of life as a journey. The Israelites who left Egypt died in the wilderness;
their children knew no other life until they finally did arrive in Canaan. So
for both generations, life was motion, journeying forward, travel through
uncharted (and unchartable) territory dependent on God for their lodging (Scripture
specifically says that God somehow provided them with the sukkot in
which they dwelt as they made their slow progress through the wilderness), their
food (the manna fell from heaven specifically to provide them with sustenance),
and their water (the pillar of cloud-by-day and fire-by-night led them from
oasis to oasis so that they always had enough to drink). And that experience of
life as journey became so embedded in the national consciousness that it
eventually merited being honored with an annual festival, one that commemorates
nothing other than this notion of life as movement forward
towards destiny under the protective wings of the Shekhinah, God’s indwelling
presence in the people’s midst.
Perhaps
that is why Jewish people are so predisposed to honor others whose lives have
become an actual journey. I feel that way myself—and not because I am in favor
of people not obeying the laws that govern immigration or, more ridiculously, of
opening our nation’s borders to whomever wishes to cross over without
exercising any control at all regarding who may or may not settle here. My own
great-grandparents were immigrants to this land and they certainly (I actually know
this for a fact) obeyed all the rules and settled here fully legally. My own
wife came to this country from Canada and I can assure you that we followed each
of a thousand rules to make her status here fully legal. All of that is true.
And also true is that I have no idea who these poor people flown to Massachusetts
as fodder for Governor DiSantis’s campaign mill really are, whether they
deserve to settle here as legitimate refugees or are just poseurs taking
a chance to improve their lot without waiting on line or following the rules
that govern immigration to our nation. I have no idea who they are! But I was beyond
impressed by the Martha’s Vinyard residents who, also
having no idea who these people are, responded to them compassionately and
warmly, leaving the federal officials to work out what their eventual status should
be and specifically not using that detail to justify turning away from
lonely, hungry people in need.
The
road, the voyage, this lifelong excursion through the wilderness that is our
lives—that experience of life as journey under God’s watchful presence is at
the core of Sukkot, an idea that grants majesty to the human condition not by
boasting crazily about our permanence and power, but by owning up honestly and
humbly to the transient nature of all life…and to the fragility that inheres in
living our lives, as we all do, on the road to Jerusalem. I responded to the
story of those refugees the governor flew north because they, like my own
great-grandparents once were, are on a journey regarding the destination of
which they can only hope. But I too am on that journey. So are we all. And
Sukkot is our annual opportunity to set aside the natural fear that that image
of life-as-journey engenders and instead to embrace the hope that the road we
travel through the years can generate…when viewed not as punishment but as
opportunity, not as a death march but as a march of the truly living, not as a
torturous trek through an unfeeling, uncaring world…but as the road to redemption.
Our ancestors eventually found their way to the Promised Land and they
celebrated the journey that took them there. So should we all!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.